Wallace v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurrence
CHAPEL, Vice Presiding Judge,
specially concurring:
I believe a competent defendant in a capital case can waive his right to direct appeal.1 However, I cannot agree with the majority’s reliance on Cooper v. State2 and the discussion regarding due process which is contained in dicta in the Cooper opinion. In Cooper I concurred in result without writing because of the analysis of the Due Process Clause. I now find Cooper cited here for that purpose, and I must write to state my disagreement with the analysis in Cooper.
This issue is not before us; this Court need not attempt to precisely delineate…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.