State v. Hass
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Steams county charged with the crime of grand larceny in the first degree, tried in the district court for that county before Roeser, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The defendant was convicted of grand larceny in the first degree and appeals.
1. The defendant lived at St. Paul where he had been an automobile machinist and a part owner in a garage. The business was unsuccessful. On May 26, 1919, he went to St. Cloud, in response, he says, to *270an. advertisement for a machinist in the Pan motor plant. He arrived between 7 and 8 in the evening. In the early morning of the next day, apparently shortly after midnight, two autos were stolen, one known as the Bruening auto and the other the Jerrard auto. He was convicted of stealing the Jerrard auto which he was…
2Cited by12 opinions
- State v. GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Bush v. HavirSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- James v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Polin v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.