Legal Opinion

United States v. Interstate R. Co.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided August 3, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeDOWELL, District Judge.

This is an action at law, in which trial by jury was waived. In March, 1920, four of the defendant’s directors lived in Philadelphia, and the remaining two directors, Messrs. Miller and Ayers, lived in Big Stone Gap, Va. On March 11, 1920, being under a mistaken belief as to the nature of the offer made in section 209, Transportation Act 1920 (41 Stat. 464 [Comp. St. § lOOTl^dd]), the four Philadelphia directors held a special board meeting and adopted a resolution accepting the offer made in said section. A notification of this resolution was sent to the Interstate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holcombe v. Trenton White City Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
  2. Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1915
  3. Chase v. TuttleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  4. Stafford Springs Street Railway Co. v. Middle River Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  5. Smith v. Sinaloa Land & Fruit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Textron, Inc. v. American Woolen Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
  2. Gartrell v. KnightDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1982
  3. Wright v. McLauryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  4. Alonso v. Imperial County Sheriff OfficeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API