Legal Opinion

Short v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 5, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The record shows that the original contract was in writing’ and was executed by the parties on the 13th day of September, 1916. It recites that iW. A. Thompson is the owner of certain land, which is described in the contract, and that W. J. Short agrees to clear 165 acres of said land fpr the sum of $400. Short agreed to remove from the land so cleared all timber and growth by using that part that was marketable and burning the remainder. The contract provides that the term “cleared land” as used means land with all timber removed in such a way as that all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGaughey v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. Horstmann v. LaFargueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Choate v. O'NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  4. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1861
  5. Tallman v. McGahheySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wright v. LakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Home Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. MastersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Held v. MansurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Ford Hardwood Lumber Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. State Use Crawfordsville Special School District v. Huxtable.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API