Home Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Masterson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The first question which we shall .consider is whether or not the $9,000 policy was a wager contract. This court is committed to the rule that the issuance of a policy of life insurance to one who has no insurable interest in the life of the insured, but who pays the premium for the chance of collecting the policy, is invalid, as the contract is a wager, and against public policy. McRae v. Warmack, 98 Ark. 52, 135 S. W. 807, 33 L. R. A. N. S. 949. In that case it was also held that the assignment of a policy of insurance to one having no insurable…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Page v. BurnstineSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Missouri State Life Insurance v. CranfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Steinback v. . DiepenbrockNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- McGaughey v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- PHL Variable Insurance v. Price Dawe 2006 Insurance Trust Ex Rel. Christiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Beard v. American Agency Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Naoma R. Gill v. General American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Lincoln National Life Insurance v. Joseph Schlanger 2006 Insurance TrustSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Baker v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.