Legal Opinion

In re: Cigna ERISA Litigation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02465Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN RE: CIGNA ERISA LITIGATION : No. 25-cv-2465-JMY : : : MEMORANDUM Younge, J. April 8, 2026 Currently before the Court is a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending a Decision by the Supreme Court in Anderson v. Intel that was filed by Defendants. (Motion to Stay, ECF No. 41.) The Court finds this Motion appropriate for resolution without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7.1(f). For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum, Defendants’ Motion will be denied. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Akishev v. KapustinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
  3. Winston Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API