Wight v. Cumb. Telph. & Telg. Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 38. — ACTION ' BY JOHN Y. WIGHT AGAINST THE CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY — Appeal from Jefferson Circuit' Court (Common Pleas Brandi, First Division). Emmet Field, Judge. From a judgment dismissing lais petition, plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Hobson
— Affirming.
John Wight was in the service of the Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Company as a member of a take-out crew; that is, a crew whose duty it was to remove telephones from houses when the service was discontinued. Wight and a man by the name of G-oldstein constituted the crew; neither being the superior of the other. They went to take out the telephone from the house of a Mrs. Wolf on East Burnett street in Louisville. The telephone wires ran along East Burnett street on the opposite side of the street from the house, and a wire was stretched…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilson v. Chess & Wymond Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Lee's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Smith's Admr. v. North Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Shemwell v. Owensboro & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Trosper v. East Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
3Cited by11 opinions
- Evans Chemical Works v. BallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Kentucky Utilities Co. v. SearcyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- C., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Perkins' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Duvin Coal Company v. FikeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Dyer v. Pauley Jail Building Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.