Legal Opinion

Hartnagel v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1931No. 28,332PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying her alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Alice Engel, a sister of plaintiff, died testate in April, 1929; Belva Alexander was appointed administratrix of her estate. The will provided first for the payment of all debts. Plaintiff filed a claim against the estate in the probate court; it was allowed. An appeal was taken to the district court. Pleadings were made under the direction of the court; the complaint declared on an account stated, and the answer, in addition to a general denial, specifically denied any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Bolles v. BoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Russell & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Big Diamond Milling Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Denny v. MarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erickson v. HusemollerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Berghuis v. BurgesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API