Legal Opinion
People v. Rayford
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 29, 1986No. 86SA12PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRSHBAUM, Justice.
In this interlocutory appeal, the People challenge an order of the Boulder County District Court suppressing statements made by the defendant, Curtis Rayford, and certain evidence seized from the defendant’s automobile. 1 The People contend that the trial court erred in concluding that the statements resulted from an arrest not supported by probable cause and that the affidavit supporting an application for a warrant to search the defendant’s car failed to establish probable cause. We conclude that the defendant’s arrest and the search of his vehicle were supported by…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Regina Warlick, Cross-Appellant v. Herman Cross, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Hoffman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- People v. Turcotte-SchaefferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- People v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. McCoySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.