Legal Opinion
Winget Kickernick Co. v. La Mode Garment Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 1, 1930No. 8485PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Though some showing is made by defendant upon the proposition that plaintiff comes into court with unclean hands, I find myself unable to say definitely that the misuse of the word “patented” shown was not merely the result of a mistake upon the part of the employees of plaintiff and without knowledge and approval upon the part of its executive officers. Henee, I am unwilling to base my decision upon the affirmative of this proposition.
Plaintiff, sues upon its trade-mark “Kickernick” registered September 12, 1922, and stated to have been continuously used in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Valvoline Oil Co. v. Havoline Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1913
- S. R. Feil Co. v. John E. Robbins Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- Loughran v. Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. Winget Kickernick Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Glenmore Distilleries Co. v. National Distillers Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Perfection Co. v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1945
- Dietene Co. v. Dietrim Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1954