Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Eustace v. Bowman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1918No. 1953PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District /Court, Hendersou County; J. S. Prince, Judge. Action by the First State Bank of Eus-° tace against Sam 'Bowman and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

On November 14, 1010, Sam Bowman and wife executed and delivered to the appellant their promissory note fo,r the sum of $575.70 due one year after date and providing for the payment of interest and attorney’s fees. To secure the payment of this note they also executed a mortgage on some personal property and 74 acres of land. On January 12, 1016, more than four years after maturity of the note, appellant filed this suit against Bowman, claiming a balance due of $505.45. Some time after the institution of the suit Bowman died, and by an amended original petition his heirs were made parties and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Benson v. PhippsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Heisch v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Wells v. MoorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. MacEo v. DoigCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Powers v. SchubertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. McNeill v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Nassar v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Hunt v. WroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API