Legal Opinion

Doorley v. O'Gorman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Mary O’Gorman, from two orders of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York, respectively, on the 28th day of January, 1898, and on the 25th day of February, 1898, denying the applications of said defendant for a new trial under section 1525 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J.:

The action is ejectment. It was tried on the 5th of December, 1895, and a verdict rendered in favor of the defendant, O’Gonnan, upon which verdict a final 'judgment was entered on the 20th of December, 1895. That judgment was affirmed by this court upon appeal and the plaintiff thereupon obtained a new trial upon payment of the costs, in pursuance of the provisions of section 1525 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Upon the new trial the plaintiff recovered and a final judgment was entered in his favor on the 20th of December, 1897. A motion was thereupon made by the defendant for a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bellinger v. MartindaleNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ten Eyck v. WitbeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Jarvis v. American Forcite Powder Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Barson v. MulliganNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Benta v. HarrisCity of New York Municipal Court · 1899
  5. Doorley v. O'GormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API