Legal Opinion

Barson v. Mulligan

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1903No. Motion for new trialPublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

The action is ejectment. The defendant seeks a new trial under section 1525 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The case has been tried twice. A judgment for the plaintiffs on the first trial was reversed on appeal and a new trial ordered, which resulted in a judgment for the plaintiffs awarding them possession of the premises and, as damages, $3,138.31, the value of the use and occupation of the land, $2,450 double damages for wilfully withholding it after notice to quitj and $519.71 costs, making a total of $6,108.02. The jury found the value of the use and occupation of the premises to be $700…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clason v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Larned v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Doorley v. O'GormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barson v. MulliganNew York Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API