Legal Opinion

State v. C & H NATIONWIDE, INC.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 28, 1994No. 2 CA-CV 93-0273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, the State of Arizona, filed an indemnification action against appellee C & H Nationwide, Inc. (C & H), for settlement money paid as a result of a fatal traffic accident involving an oversize load transported by C & H. The state appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and the granting of C & H’s cross-motion for summary judgment after finding that the state’s indemnity action was beyond the scope of its statutory authority. On cross-appeal, C & H challenges the trial court’s denial of its motion for attorneys’ fees.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hill-Shafer Partnership v. Chilson Family TrustArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Pritchard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Air Transport Associates, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. State v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haole v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Pleak v. Entrada Property Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. Pleak v. EntradaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API