State v. C & H NATIONWIDE, INC.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, the State of Arizona, filed an indemnification action against appellee C & H Nationwide, Inc. (C & H), for settlement money paid as a result of a fatal traffic accident involving an oversize load transported by C & H. The state appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and the granting of C & H’s cross-motion for summary judgment after finding that the state’s indemnity action was beyond the scope of its statutory authority. On cross-appeal, C & H challenges the trial court’s denial of its motion for attorneys’ fees.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Hill-Shafer Partnership v. Chilson Family TrustArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Pritchard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Air Transport Associates, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- State v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haole v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Pleak v. Entrada Property Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Pleak v. EntradaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003