Legal Opinion

Sobeck v. Centennial Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 3, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, J.S.C.

This case raises issues of first impression concerning the interpretation of the PIP benefit provisions of our No Fault law. N.J.S.A. 89:6A-1 et seq. The major issues projected are the applicable period of the statute of limitations under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, the entitlement to coverage for PIP benefits of an unborn child at the time of the accident and the cause and effect relationship between the stress experienced in an automobile accident and the onset of a premature birth one month later. The relative facts are as follows. The plaintiff Joanne Silvia Sobeck (hereinafter…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Vispisiano v. Ashland Chemical Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Lynch v. RubackySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Giardina v. BennettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. B.C. v. T.G.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  2. Fire Insurance Exchange v. HornerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API