Legal Opinion

Fire Insurance Exchange v. Horner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2012No. Nos. WD 73902, WD 73903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.

Gail and Darrell Mansfield (“the Mans-fields”) and Caleb Horner appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Fire Insurance Exchange (“FIE”) on its petition for declaratory judgment. On appeal, Horner and the Mansfields contend that the trial court erred in granting FIE’s motion for summary judgment because a household resident exclusion clause in Horner’s homeowners insurance policy did not unambiguously exclude coverage for injuries sustained by Horner’s unborn child. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Factual and Procedural Background

Appell…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Shahan v. ShahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. United Missouri Bank, N.A. v. City of GrandviewMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. American Motorists Insurance Co. v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. PigottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walden v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State Committee for Marital & Family Therapists v. HaynesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API