Legal Opinion

Gallio v. Conigliaro

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1995No. B081175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Here we hold that the state constitutional right to privacy (Cal. Const., art. I, § 1) and newly enacted Family Code section 853, subdivision (a) preclude discovery of a living person’s will. Gloria Conigliaro and Joanne Pinherio (hereinafter the children) appeal from a judgment that the property of their deceased father, John Gallic, Jr. (father), was not transmuted to community property. The trial court ruled that the children could not compel the production of Helen M. Gallio’s (stepmother’s) will and testamentary documents to show an agreement between father and stepmother…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Schindler v. SchindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Estate of WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Estate of JamesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Harris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rancho Publications v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. In Re Marriage of HoltemannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Cecconi v. Cecconi (In Re Cecconi)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2007
  4. In re BraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Pearce v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API