United States v. Wooten
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McDEBMOTT, Circuit Judge.
The United States, as guardian of the Indians of the Pueblo of Taos, sued to quiet the title to 78 tracts of land; the decision of the trial court was adverse to the government as to part of the tracts; and this appeal challenges the correctness of the decree as to twelve of them. While the facts differ somewhat in the twelve cases, one fact is common *884to all of the eases, and that is that taxes levied by the state upon the lands prior to June 7, 1924 (the date of the Pueblo Lands Act [25 USD A § 331 note]), were not paid by the defendants prior to delinquency. When…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Illinois Central Railroad v. State Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pueblo De Taos v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Mississippi River Fuel Corporation and Murphy Corporation v. Rufus W. Fontenot, Collector of Revenue, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Ward v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Pueblo De Taos v. GusdorfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- C & F REALTY CORPORATION v. MershonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.