Legal Opinion

Jimmy Ray Pitsonbarger v. Richard Gramley

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 9, 1998No. 95-3912PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

When we last considered Jimmy Ray Pitsonbarger’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, we evaluated it in light of this court’s decision in Lindh v. Murphy, 96 F.3d 856 (7th Cir. 1996)(ere banc), in which we had concluded that the provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), Pub. L. No. 104-132, applied to petitions that were pending on the effective date of that law. The Supreme Court, however, did not agree with our analysis of AED-PA’s retroactivity; it held instead that the amendments that AEDPA made to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 do not apply…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Clyde Piggie v. Zettie Cotton, Cylde Piggie v. Zettie CottonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. People v. PitsonbargerIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Clarence Ray Allen v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Moore v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Martize R. Dellinger v. Edward R. Bowen, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API