Legal Opinion

Geuder, Paeschke & Frey Co. v. Com'r of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 18, 1930No. 4201PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner is a Wisconsin corporation organized in 1882, and since its organization has been engaged in the business of manufacturing tin and japanned sheet metal, galvanized ware, and metal stampings. Its books of accounts showed its invested capital and surplus, a part of which consisted of physical assets of buildings, machinery, tools and dies, factory fixtures and equipment,, and automobiles. The company’s investment in these assets was shown, and the accounts also showed depreciation reserves and sinking fund accounts representing the amount of accrued depreciation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Dobbins v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  3. Alameda Park Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1930
  4. Haugh & Keenan Storage & Transfer Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1932
  2. Portland General Electric Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  3. Charles A. Polizzi v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  4. Washburn Wire Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
  5. Cumberland Glass Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API