Legal Opinion

Paving Improvement District No. 12 v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1953No. 5-74Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This is a direct attack on the assessments of benefits on one parcel of property. Appellants, Paving District No. 12 and Curb & Gutter District No. 11, are companion districts: No. 12 being for the purpose of paving, and No. 11 being for the purpose of curbing and guttering, a portion of McKinney Street in the City of Springdale, Arkansas. The ordinance, levying the assessment of benefits in each district, was duly passed and published by the City Council;1 and within thirty days thereafter, appellees, Brooks and wife, filed a suit in the Chancery Court against each…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turner v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Lenon v. Street Improvement District No. 512Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API