Turner v. Adams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). At the outset it may be stated that the present suit was commenced within thirty days after the publication of the passage of the assessment ordinance, and therefore constitutes a direct -attack upon the assessment of benefits filed with the council. Missouri Pacific Rd. Co. v. Waterworks Improvement District, 134 Ark. 315, 203 S. W. 696; Ingram v. Thames, 150 Ark. 443, 234 S. W. 629; Henry v. Board of Improvement, 170 Ark. 673, 280 S. W. 987; and Carney v. Walbe, 175 Ark. 746, 300 S. W. 413.
The original assessment was filed with the common council, land…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kirst v. Street Improvement District No. 120Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Ingram v. ThamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Lee Wilson Co. v. Osceola & Little River Road Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Desha Road Improvement District No. 2 v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Sikes v. DouglasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kelley Trust Co. v. Paving Improvement District No. 47Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Harrell v. Southwest Mortgage CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Lenon v. Street Improvement District No. 512Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Hill v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Lenon v. Street Improvement District No. 512Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.