Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Davis v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1981No. PS 442Published

1ConcurrenceStaton, Judge

I concur in the result reached by the majority. However, I am unable to agree with the rationale upon which the majority predicates the disposition of Issue IV as it relates to the applicability of Henry v. State (1977), Ind.App., 370 N.E.2d 972, and Issues III and VI as they relate to the threatened filing of an habitual offender charge during plea negotiations.

I

Henry

The majority has misinterpreted Henry. This Court did not intend to limit its application to invalidating guilty pleas made in reliance upon unwritten, prosecutorial promises regarding sentencing. Henry, as it construes IC 1976,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API