New Mexico Department of Information Technology v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
New Mexico and other states receive federal funds for costs that are incurred in the administration of federal programs, but only to the extent that the costs are allowable (i.e., necessary and reasonable for the proper and efficient performance of a federal award) or allocable (i.e., assignable to a cost objective in accordance with the relative benefits received). Federal funds that are improperly awarded may be subject to a disallowance determination and a refund by the state. In this Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) case, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kansas Health Policy Authority v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources v. SebeliusDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2016
- Kansas Health Policy Authority v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011