State v. Griffith
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This cause is before this court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Franklin County in Columbus v. Reid (1986), 32 Ohio App.3d 7, 513 N.E.2d 351, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County in Lakewood v. Waselenchuk (1994), 94 Ohio App.3d 684, 641 N.E.2d 767, upon the following question:
“Does imposition of the exclusionary rule lie as a remedy for police violation of the accused’s statutory right to counsel under Section 2935.20 of the Revised Code in a prosecution arising under Section…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Lakewood v. WaselenchukOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- City of Fairborn v. MattachioneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Columbus v. ReidOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WeidemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SiminOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. WeidemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. StoverOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Columbus v. Dixon, 07ap-536 (4-29-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.