Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Margolis

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1936No. Civ. 5460PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff to rescind, for fraudulent and untrue representations, two policies of insurance. These identical contracts of insurance were issued April 18, 1927, by the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York in favor of respondent Margolis, and provided, first, for the payment of a fixed sum to a named beneficiary upon the death of the insured; secondly, for the payment to the same beneficiary of an additional specified sum if death was the result of an accident, and lastly, for the payment to the insured of a specified monthly sum so long as he was totally and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Dibble v. Reliance Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Kiriakides v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  4. Wilson v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. Northern Life Insurance Co. v. ChristieWashington Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tomerlin v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. DormanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. Coodley v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Trousdell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API