Legal Opinion

Taylor ex rel. Taylor v. Columbus Railway Co.

Ohio Circuit Courts

Decided June 25, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The petition is as follows:

“The State of Ohio on relation of Edward L. Taylor, Jr., who is the duly elected, qualified and acting Prosecuting Attorney of Franklin County, Ohio, says and makes known to the court that the defendant, the Columbus Railway Company, a corporation incorporated and organized under the laws of Ohio, and doing business in he city of Columbus, a municipal corporation of the first grade of the second class in said -state, claims and exercises in said city the following franchises, privileges and rights in contravention of-law, and misuses its corporate authority,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Detroit v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Greenwood v. Freight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. v. Ohio Ex Rel. PontiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API