Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. v. Ohio Ex Rel. Pontius
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court 1
245 U.S. 574 (1918)
NORTHERN OHIO TRACTION & LIGHT COMPANY ET AL.
v.
STATE OF OHIO ON THE RELATION OF PONTIUS, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF STARK COUNTY, OHIO.
No. 60.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 18, 19, 1917.
Decided January 28, 1918.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO.
Mr. John C. Welty and Mr. Joseph S. Clark, with whom Mr. John C. Weadock was on the briefs, for Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co.
Mr. W.T. Holliday filed a brief for Cleveland Trust Co., plaintiff in error.
Mr. Frank N. Sweitzer and Mr. Hubert C. Pontius for defendant in error.
2Opinion of the Court · McREYNOLDSJustice McREYNOLDS
The Northern Ohio Traction &…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Detroit v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. City of OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ross v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- City of Owensboro v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.