Legal Opinion

Gimbel Bros. v. Corcoran

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 30, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Chief Justice.

The prosecutor of this writ has a judgment, obtained by default in the Second Judicial District of the county of Hudson on June 12th, 1934. The judgment represents the then plaintiff’s claim for goods sold and delivered. The merchandise, according to the state of demand, was sold to James Corcoran and Mae Corcoran, his wife, defendants in the District Court action. A second count in the state of demand alleges that the third defendant, Mary Corcoran, guaranteed this account. Judgment was entered against all three defendants on the strength of an affidavit made by one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. CrossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  2. Wardell v. WarshofskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rhoads v. MitchellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1946
  2. Brenner v. MargoliesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Czajowski v. Arlington Realty Co.United States District Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API