Legal Opinion
Doe v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 27, 2017No. Case No. CV 15-04089 AB (FFMx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL
HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
In this ease under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq., *1174Plaintiff John Doe (“Plaintiff’) alleges that Defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) improperly terminated his long term disability benefits by applying a 24-month mental illness limitation to his claim. Plaintiff contends that Prudential should not have applied the mental illness limitation, and that therefore his benefits' .should not,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- McDaniel v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Krolnik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Furey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Hislop v. CH2M Hill Companies Ltd.District Court, D. Alaska · 2020