Legal Opinion
Furey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 10, 2020No. 4:19-cv-02144Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HANS FUREY, Case No. 19-cv-02144-DMR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 v. JUDGMENT 10 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Re: Dkt. Nos. 22-25 COMPANY, 11 Defendant. 12 13 This is an action for long-term disability benefits pursuant to the Employee Retirement 14 Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a), brought by Plaintiff Hans Furey 15 against Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”). MetLife submitted the 16 administrative record under seal and the parties filed cross motions for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Donald Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan Erisa PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Salomaa v. Honda Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.