Legal Opinion

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Long

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 13, 1897PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Application for the appointment of appraisers to estimate damages accruing to the respondents from the taking of their land for railroad purposes, made to the Son. Milton A. Shumway, a judge of the Superior Court; facts found and judgment rendered in favor of the applicant, and appeal by the respondents for alleged errors in the rulings of the judge.

Read the full summary

Application for the appointment of appraisers to estimate damages accruing to the respondents from the taking of their land for railroad purposes, made to the Son. Milton A. Shumway, a judge of the Superior Court; facts found and judgment rendered in favor of the applicant, and appeal by the respondents for alleged errors in the rulings of the judge. In this court the appellee filed a motion to erase the appeal, on the ground that none could be taken in proceedings of this nature; but withdrew the motion when the ease was reached for argument. The application to Judge Shumway is as follows:—…

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, C. J.

Section 3464 of the General Statutes prescribes that “ when any railroad company shall have the right to take real estate for railroad purposes, and cannot obtain it by agreement with the parties interested therein, it may apply to any judge of the Superior Court for the appointment of appraisers to estimate all damages,” etc. The application in this case is brought under that section. It purports to set forth facts from which it will appear that the applicant, a railroad company, has the right to take for railroad purposes the real estate described in the first paragraph, and that it cannot…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Varick v. Smith & The Attorney GeneralNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
  4. People Ex Rel. Herrick v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Searl v. School District No. 2Supreme Court of the United States · 1888

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Carofano v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Board of Water Commissioners v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API