Legal Opinion

Nat'l Transit Staffing, Inc. v. Norris

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 4, 2018No. CV–17–479PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrandon J. Harrison, Judge

The issue here is whether methamphetamine was present in Mark Norris's body when he was injured at work so that his employer and its insurance carrier are entitled to receive a rebuttable presumption that the workplace injury was substantially occasioned by the drug. The Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission (Commission) answered no, and Norris's employer and its insurance carrier appeal that decision. We hold that substantial evidence supports the Commission's decision. We also affirm the Commission's award of temporary total-disability (TTD) benefits.

I. The Accident and Its Aftermath

Nati…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Prock v. Bull Shoals Boat LandingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Farmers Cooperative v. BilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Linthicum v. Mar-Bax Shirt Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  5. High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Remington Arms Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Cent. Moloney, Inc. v. ScolesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API