Legal Opinion
Justin Alicea v. PayByPhone US Inc., et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 8, 2026No. 3:26-cv-01266Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JUSTIN ALICEA, Case No. 26-cv-01266-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. COMPEL ARBITRATION; GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 10 PAYBYPHONE US INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 23, 25 Defendants. 11 12 13 Plaintiff Justin Alicea brings this action on behalf of a putative multi-state class of 14 PayByPhone subscribers. He alleges that defendants PayByPhone US Inc. and PayByPhone 15 Technologies Inc. (together, “PayByPhone”) have “misle[]d[] consumers by starting street parking 16 meter times before consumers have confirmed…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.