Legal Opinion

Jewel Tea Co. v. Ransdell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1937No. 27254PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county by Lida Christine Ransdell, a minor, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, by her next friend, against the Jewel Tea Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as defendant, and V. L. Reeder. The plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries to her mouth, teeth and face alleged to have been sustained as the result of a collision between an 'automobile in which she was riding and a truck owned by the defendant and driven by Y. L. Reeder. Service of process was not had upon V. L. Reed-er and he was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gulf, C. Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Brown WilliamsonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. City of Kingfisher v. AltizerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. MelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Haynes v. TrentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Henryetta Construction Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Liberty Nat. Bank of Weatherford v. SemkoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Chowins v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. North v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API