Legal Opinion

Gakiya v. Hallmark Properties, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1986No. 11019; CIVIL NO. 70718PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

Plaintiff-Appellant Raymond M. Gakiya (Gakiya) appeals from a circuit court order directing that his claim for payment from the Real Estate Recovery Fund (Fund) against Hallmark Properties, Inc. (Hallmark) be apportioned with certain other outstanding claims. Gakiya contends that the Defendant-Appellee Real Estate Commission (Commission) should have paid his claim in full on a first-come, first-served basis. He further contends that as a result of the unauthorized apportionment, he received $1,649.85 of his certified claim for $9,335.11.

Finding no abuse of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. SacocoHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Treloar v. Swinerton and Walberg Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. FosterHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Keller v. ThompsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Thayer v. Federal Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Crawford for Crawford v. CrawfordHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Painting Industry of Hawaii Market Recovery Fund v. AlmHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Crawford for Crawford v. CrawfordHawaii Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API