Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Boarder to Boarder Trucking, Inc. v. Mondi, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 18, 1992No. 13-91-322-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceGilberto Hinojosa, Justice

I concur in the result only. The majority holds that a trial court cannot permit amendments to pleadings after judgment is rendered but during the time when the trial court retains plenary power. I believe that the authority the majority cites does not support this holding. I would hold that a trial court has discretion to permit post-trial amendments to pleadings which conform to the evidence and the jury’s verdict after judgment is rendered and during the court’s plenary period.

The trial court in the instant case signed a judgment reflecting the jury’s verdict after the trial on the merits.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Greenhalgh v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lucas v. Texas Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Home Owners Funding Corp. of America v. Scheppler, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Kelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1984
  5. Santa Rosa Medical Center v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API