Legal Opinion

Ghidotti v. Waldron

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 2, 2019No. 20180045-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

APPLEBY, Judge:

¶1 Darnell and Greg Ghidotti appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Melodie Waldron and Re/Max Metro (collectively, Re/Max). The court ruled that the Ghidottis were unable to prove their damages with the requisite degree of certainty and had not properly disclosed Darnell 1 as an expert witness prior to trial. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 The Ghidottis were looking to purchase a house where they could live and operate a dog training and boarding business. They specifically wanted to find one in a community that was not controlled by a homeowners'…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Atkin Wright & Miles v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cook Associates, Inc. v. WarnickUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Utah Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. CrookUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kilpatrick v. Wiley, Rein & FieldingUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Pete v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Diversified Striping v. KrausCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  2. Segota v. Young ChryslerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  3. Blank v. Garff Enterprises IncCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  4. Berger v. Ogden Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. In re Adoption of E.M.F...Court of Appeals of Utah · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API