Moore v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
This court has given this case our careful attentive consideration, and we are not in accord with the lower court’s conception of the case, and his numerous rulings during its pendency.
We are of the opinion that this prosecution was improvidently begun. We think under the facts adduced upon the trial, the case comes within the purview of the case of Walker v. State, 132 Ala. 11, 31 So. 557. In that case the Supreme Court said: “If a man takes improper liberties with the person of a female, or indecently fondles her without her will and consent, he is guilty of an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brasher v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Robison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
- Thomas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Reach v. ReachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Smithson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Smithson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949