Legal Opinion

Smithson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1949No. 6 Div. 712PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case was assigned to Presiding Judge BRICKEN, who prepared the opinion hereafter appearing. A majority being in disagreement, that opinion becomes a dissent. The effect of the dissenting opinion would be to reaffirm the conclusions we reached in the case of Moore v. State,33 Ala. App. 188, 31 So.2d 373.

As Mr. Justice Frankfurter of the United States Supreme Court recently stated: "Wisdom too often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late."

After considerable study and research, we now entertain the view that we fell into error in the Moore case, in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gunter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. People v. KlyczekIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Loveland v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. TweedyWashington Supreme Court · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Jones-JournetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Williams v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API