Legal Opinion · Dissent
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Bentley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 10, 1943No. Nos. 33,446, 33,499, 33,522, 33,523PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Dissent
CASE NO. 33446
The land involved lies in the state of South Dakota. The condemnation proceedings are pending in Big Stone county, Minnesota. The owners of this land are attempting to compel the state of Minnesota to condemn it by having it included in the Minnesota proceedings and are asking that the damages to their South Dakota lands be assessed by commissioners appointed or to be appointed in Big Stone county from residents of that county.
The state is objecting on the ground that the courts in Minnesota have no jurisdiction to condemn lands outside the state.
By virtue of its power of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1913
- Mannville Co. v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- McCarter v. Hudson County Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Holyoke Water Power Co. v. Connecticut River Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1884
- Twin City Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943