Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 1984No. 83-104-NJ-1; CA A27542PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The sheriff of Jackson County appeals from the issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding him to “serve and execute Summons and process” in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage. The issue is whether the sheriff has a statutory duty to serve summonses in civil actions.1 We affirm.

On January 1, 1983, the sheriff, due to budget cuts, adopted a policy of refusing to serve summonses and complaints in all civil proceedings. Thereafter, respondent filed a petition for dissolution. The sheriff refused to serve a summons, the petition, an order waiving fees and costs and an order granting temporary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perry v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Whipple v. Oregon School Activities Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Harris v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Schoeneman v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burks v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API