Legal Opinion

Schoeneman v. Bennett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, C. J.

This is a mandamus proceeding brought by petitioner in the circuit court for Multnomah county to *258require the respondent as clerk of the district court for Multnomah county to issue a writ of attachment. A demurrer to an alternative writ was sustained and the writ dismissed. Petitioner has appealed.

We were informed on oral argument that this proceeding was instituted by petitioner, who is a private process server, in an attempt to establish his right to serve writs of attachment issued by the clerk of the district court in Multnomah county. From the alternative writ it appears that the issue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitney v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Johnson v. CITY OF ASTORIAOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lane v. BallOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bailey v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Mutzig v. HopeOregon Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Adams Motorcycle Sales, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API