Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. the Rhode Island Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 10, 1907PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Trespass on the Case for negligence.

1Per curiam

The defendant’-s exceptions are mostly trivial

and call for no other comment. Those which are seriously relied upon must be overruled for the following reasons:(1) Injury to the pelvic organs may well be included in the claim in the declaration of injury to the “ internal organs,” and specific notice that pelvic injury was claimed was given to the defendant’s surgeon and was immediately reported to its counsel, as the surgeon testified at the trial. It is plain that this claim was no surprise to the defendant, and the evidence was properly admitted.

The circumstances of the accident made it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hooper v. BaconSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Lesh v. Illinois Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Wright v. BlakesleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Morro v. BrockettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. Burkett v. Dental Perfection Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API