Legal Opinion
Kanti-Savita Realty Corp. v. Santiago
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 13, 2007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order reversed without costs and tenants’ motion to dismiss the petition denied.
In this nonpayment proceeding commenced in September 2006 landlord seeks to recover possession of a room in a single-room-occupancy (SRO) facility (see Multiple Dwelling Law § 4 [16]) located in a “class B” multiple dwelling (see Multiple Dwelling Law § 4 [9]), and arrears at the rate of $150 per week for the period beginning August 6, 2006. According to the petition, the apartment is subject to the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 (RSL). Tenants moved to dismiss the petition, claiming…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- ShopRite Supermarkets, Inc. v. Yonkers Plaza Shopping, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- John Washington, Ltd. v. GulbreathAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1997
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brianic International Realty Corp. v. PittCivil Court of the City of New York · 2009
- Branic International Realty Corp. v. PittAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010
- 222 E. 12 Realty LLC v. McNallyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
- Aimco 240 W. 73rd St., LLC v. KorenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
- Branic International Realty Corp. v. PittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.