Legal Opinion

Brianic International Realty Corp. v. Pitt

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided June 9, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*941OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerald Lebovits, J.

In 2001, respondent began living in room 214 of a single room occupancy (SRO) hotel located at 216 West 103rd Street in New York County. New York City placed him there under an agreement — not submitted to this court* — between the New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA) and petitioner. HRA paid respondent’s rent, $2,000 a month.

In this holdover proceeding, petitioner alleges that respondent lost the right to inhabit the premises when HRA sent petitioner a letter dated April 17, 2007, stating that the respondent no longer resided at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. JMD Holding Corp. v. Congress Financial Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Kanti-Savita Realty Corp. v. SantiagoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Branic International Realty Corp. v. PittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Branic International Realty Corp. v. PittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Smiley v. WilliamsCivil Court of the City of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API