Legal Opinion
Murphy v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided July 13, 2006No. 06-05-00207-CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice ROSS.
Jermaine Donte Murphy appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, namely cocaine, in an amount greater than four hundred grams. The State charged Murphy with two offenses arising out of a traffic stop. In addition to possession of a controlled substance, Murphy was charged with possession of drug paraphernalia in justice court. Before trial on the possession of a controlled substance charge, Murphy filed a motion to suppress and a motion to dismiss the indictment based on the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Murphy alleged he had been…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- York v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Gonzalez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
- Billy Jack Day v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Francisco Gonzalez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.