Legal Opinion

Bennett Post v. Henderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1925No. 11311PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, O. J.

In so far as necessary to-an understanding of the conclusion to which-we have arrived, we will briefly state that this case is one in which the appellee Henderson sued the appellants, Bennett & Post,, and others not necessary to name, alleging, in substance that he had purchased from the named defendants a certain Hupmobile car, giving therefor a Ford car at the agreed value of $325 and his promissory note for $183.-70, payable in monthly installments, of which he had paid three, aggregating $55.11. He-further alleged that Bennett & Post had' fraudulently misrepresented the value…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Paschen v. LovettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Kuhn v. City of YoakumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Cameron v. First Nat. Bank of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morriss-Buick Co. v. PondromTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. American Title Insurance Company v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Clark v. OrrSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Thompson v. American Power & Light Co. American Power & Light Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API