Hamm v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
Appellant entered pleas of guilty to misdemeanor charges and, after sentence, sought to withdraw them on the ground that the pleas had been entered under a misapprehension and misunderstanding by the defendant as to the consequences of so doing, and that they had not been intelligently entered. His motions to withdraw the pleas were denied and he appeals, enumerating error, inter alia, on the grounds that the trial court erred "in refusing to allow appellant to testify [at the hearing on his motions to withdraw the pleas] as to the facts and circumstances, as he understood…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Conlogue v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Bonner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Ballard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Paino v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.