Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hoffman v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 1982No. LUBA No. 81-058, CA A21857Published

1DissentButtler, P. J.

Because I disagree with the majority’s understanding of the significance of the Supreme Court’s decision in Gordon v. City of Beaverton, 292 Or 228, 637 P2d 125 (1981), I dissent from that portion of the opinion disposing of petitioner’s third and fourth arguments, which relate to LUBA’s authority to accept a late filing of the petition and supporting brief after the agency has acquired jurisdiction.

Petitioner’s third argument is the more troublesome one, because LUBA based its dismissal here on our opinion in Gordon v. City of Beaverton, 52 Or App 937, 630 P2d 366 (1981), that the agency had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. David M. Scott Construction Corp. v. FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Fish & Wildlife Department v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gordon v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Gordon v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API